![]() |
Emerging Markets |
|
|
Other Forums: What's New Bond Discussions Newslink |
|
|
Posted by
BradyNet
(
Friday, August 29, '03
)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think you might be a little late in that sell call....
Cause we are in 2003 you know?....
This thing has been going down for 4 years....
You are only 4 years late....
Try again in 2007!
Regards!
<PS>: We might see a lot of short sellers of any news loosing their jobs this year.... Like the President of Garantia (CSFB Brasil), that just lost his job today.... He was a seller of TNE at 9 dolars and a buyer of dolars at 3.10.... Lost his job.... Today.... Who will be the next? There are a lot of asses on the line if SPX brakes the 1015 for real..... How many short sellers stops must be hanging around that level?
With regard to what is on your mind, you have considerable reserves of energy and support to draw upon. This is the right time to nurture creativity by collecting and organizing your good ideas and plans. In this way, even great and difficult undertakings can be successful.
A hidden source of power for the great is the study of the past. The lives of wise and successful men and women are like treasures buried in the earth. Great good fortune comes to those who unearth these valuable treasures by applying the lessons of the ages to current events.
a unanimidade é impressionante....
Tspp é um lixo.....
É unanime!
Será que ta no preço a unanimidade?
geralmente está......
Ja Embratel ta mais dividida, ainda tem nego que acredita.....
Da internet grátis e tal.....
Ja vale é ouro!
Petro é ouro!
Telemar ta virando, mas ainda não virou..... Vai virar, dinheiro gringo vai virar ouro a telemar também.....
Investimento direto vai sair pelo ladrão no segundo semestre e la por fins de outubro vai estar tudo no preço......
Até lá, vai ser um tal de zé vendinha sendo mandado embora, um atrás do outro.....
Mas o trade relativo ta comendo solto.....
Quando falei semana passada compra tspp e vende vale tava 200 contra 4.24...... Neguinho tirou onda da minha cara e tal.....
Hoje eu comprei tspp e vendi telemar......
Daqui a uma semana nóis faiz a conta.....
Hedge, tem que ir fazendo hedge.....
É que neguinho é tudo zé comprinha, mas aprender a operar alta mesmo, ninguém sabe, tudo gente jóvem que viu baixa e mais baixa durante 5 anos....
Vão aprender a operar a alta lá nos 18.000.....
Com dolar a 2.80.....
Não foi aos 9.000 que a moçada aprendeu a operar baixa? Fazer hedge com índice e tal?
Então, agora aos 18.000 vão aprender a operar alta......
Vale subiu hoje?
Subiu claro, hedge, neguinho enfiou a bota em vale e tomou o resto uma semana seguida, reverteu uma parte hoje, pra poder socar o bambu amanhã outra vez assim que mercado mostrar alguma força......
Fazem 3 ou 4 dias que tspp está performando pior que o mercado..... Mas antes tivemos 8 dias que ela performaou bem melhor..... E antes 10 dias que performou pior......
Telemar agulhou na compra 21 com 60 e 50 hoje.....
Tspp vai agulhar em breve.....
Embratel engolfou pra baixo em dolar e em real....
tspp não....
Tspp ta sobrevendida outra vez.....
E por uma mera coencidência, no dia em que o forum é unanime:
Tspp é um lixo total!
Eu to só olhando aqui, operando ali e tal......
Vou até tirar todo mundo do meu filtro outra vez e ver no que que da.....
SANTIAGO -- Latin American policymakers need to favor creation of new companies and jobs and focus more strongly on fighting poverty, 2001 Nobel Prize laureate for economics Joseph Stiglitz wrote in an article released Thursday.
Development "doesn't consist solely in accumulating capital and assigning resources in the most efficient way" but also "represents a transformation of society," Stiglitz wrote in the article for the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, a U.N. think tank.
Stiglitz argued in favor of reforms that would better reflect balances between markets and the state and simultaneously strengthen both. Rather than focusing energy on fighting inflation, job creation should be sought, while helping to create new companies needed to take precedence over restructuring and privatization of existing companies, Stiglitz wrote.
Policymakers also needed to abandon the trickle-down theory in favor of actively reducing poverty, he added. , ……………..>
You are at the MERCY of an INFIDEL ! How many times has The Nostradamus prevented catastrophy ? From Chitchen Itza to the World we have helped the repented !
YES ! but to the INFIDELS that are into Brasil I may call to task: SELL ! and for my many, many followers after the cleansing selling, be in cash and do nothing for the time is for contrision and repent, look into yourselves and find the cleansing light of happiness of being in CASH !
Repent and Love !
ttp://www.numion.com/YourSpeed/
What was shown in the earlier posting is an errot.
My comp download speeds are slow. 4min/1mb.
30kbps refers tu the speed of the internet surfing
The measued speed at this moment is 4434 bytes per sec = 35 kilobits per second.
Measured at this link : http://www.cancer.org/docroot/home/...
In one of my professions, if theory and reality collide and if an ultra fast decision is made without further examination, one could lose the license and even get jail time!
Again each has his own style and training.
Carib: I agree, Brazil's tax burden is excessive. This is a consensus even among the Brazilian govt. Moreover, a disproportional amount of the tax revenues goes to the well-off-- effectively concentrating wealth even more. The IMF, I am sure, also agrees with all this. However, other than setting fiscal targets, the IMF has no official say on taxation or public spending. The most it can do is to encourage reforms that will in time reduce and improve the quality of public spending, such as the pension reform. Going beyond polite encouragement would surely meet with fierce resistance from Brazilian politicians, not at all keen to let IMF interfere in domestic issues. Blame the Brazilians, not the IMF.
< wally: ….for a computer literate your statement sounds like "2 plus 2 equals 144"!>
If realituy does not agree with the theory one has to explore the reasons instead of negating the reality. If my computer speed were to be slower I would have surely posted requests for finding cost –effective remedies I do not have inhibitions nor false egos.
A few months ago I was conversing with the owner of the computer café with the DSL connections(of CODETEL/Verizone) about how fast my internet connection of <Centennial>. Is. She agreed that it is very fast because she herself saw it when she went to the offices of Centennial.
The Centennial office addresses are: 1) Maximo Gomez with Bolivar and 2) Winston Churchill –close to Sirena Dept store. In each office there are three computers for the public to use: 30 min-60min of free time .Once the URL is typed almost instantly appears the page. Supposedly the clients get the same service. Now my connection is very fast(perhaps not as fast as the demonstration service of Centennial). Victor’ friends in DR could go to those addresses (no need of fear--central area and upper class neighborhoods)there to see for themselves and if satisfied sign up for the service.
I now remember using the dial-up service at my sister’s house in Long Island about 6-7 years ago-- In general any dial up service in DR is faster than that dial-up service in Long Issland, and the Centennial dial-up service is incredibly faster. If you are further interested, I will try to get the telephone number of the technical staff for you to call them and find out more information.
Glutt: the IMF says nothing about the tax burden. All the IMF cares about is stabilizaing debt/GDP, which is achieved thru fiscal surpluses. Unfortunately for Brazil, fiscal surpluses have come by way of higher taxes, rather than reduced expenditures.
couldn't one suggest to Dubjah and Wolfowitz to involve the North Koreans and kill two birds with one stone? or ask for the help of the neighbouring Mullahs?
Whats up ? GNoE having stamina problems ? Where are the Poles and Danes ?
because we are stupid and ungrateful <savo>. we should be flogged and punished in a severe way every time we call our ANALfriends bad names. they help us to make money!
Why is it that we see very little respect in this forum for the <anal> community?
MOSCOW AUG. 27. Washington has failed in its last-minute attempt to persuade Moscow to stop nuclear cooperation with Iran, ahead of a Russian-American summit next month.
Russia has not only said a firm `no' to the U.S. demand to halt the construction of a nuclear reactor at the Bushehr power station, but has bid to build another reactor in Iran.
After two days of talks on nuclear proliferation with the U.S.
Under-Secretary, John Bolton, in Moscow this week a Russian
diplomatic source was quoted as saying that "there were no new
developments on the subject of Iran at Bolton's consultations at
the Foreign Ministry."
Simultaneously, the Russian Atomic Energy Ministry announced
having handed over to the Iranian side a feasibility study for a
second reactor in Bushehr.
A spokesman for the Ministry said the document had been prepared under "agreement reached during the Atomic Minister, Alexander Rumyantsev's visit to Teheran in December 2002."
Russian sources said Mr. Bolton had failed to produce any fresh proof of Iran's alleged ambition to acquire nuclear weapons.
For its part, Moscow dismissed Washington's claim that the Bushehr nuclear project can help Iran build a nuclear bomb.
On the eve of the Russian-American consultations on nuclear proliferation, the Russian Prime Minister, Mikhail Kasyanov, approved a draft accord with Iran on the return of spent nuclear fuel from the Bushehr reactor to Russia.
The accord would clear the way for the supply of Russian nuclear
fuel to the Bushehr reactor, which is due to become operational
next year.
Russia's rejection of U.S. concerns about Iran's nuclear weapons
programme may cast a cloud over the Russian President, Vladimir
Putin's meeting with the U.S. President, George W. Bush, in Camp
David in September.
Please read our disclaimer.
Home Page |
BradyNet Pro |
Search |
CyberExchange
General Correspondence: bradynet@bradynet.com
Questions/Problems? support@bradynet.com
This site copyright © 1995-2000 BradyNet.com
Forfaiting |
Closing Prices |
Live Prices |
New Issues |
Ratings
BradyNet Tour |
BradyNet FORUMs |
BradyNet Email Directory |
Index (Site Map)
Analysis & Research |
BradyNet Center |
News |
Jobs