![]() |
Emerging Markets |
|
|
Other Forums: What's New Bond Discussions Newslink |
|
|
Posted by
BradyNet
(
Friday, June 4, '04
)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<La Embajadora de EE.UU. insistió en que su país apoya la democracia constitucional en Ecuador.
La embajadora de Estados Unidos en Ecuador, Kristie Kenney, cree que el presidente Lucio Gutiérrez terminará su mandato, no le da importancia a los rumores sobre inestabilidad política en el país y asegura que el caso del ex ministro de Bienestar Social, Patricio Acosta, no tuvo ninguna connotación política. P: ¿Cree que Lucio Gutiérrez terminará su mandato?
R: A pesar de todo este ruido, creo que el Presidente terminará su mandato y esto es bueno para el país en términos de la estabilidad, de las instituciones y de quienes quieran llegar a la Presidencia.. P: ¿Comentaron los rumores de ese fin de semana, cuando se habló entre otras cosas de la disolución del Congreso?
R: Le hemos dicho al Presidente todo el tiempo y él lo sabe perfectamente que apoyamos no solamente el Gobierno democrático constitucional de este país sino también a las instituciones constitucionales, como el Congreso, que juega un papel muy importante. Conozco muchos diputados y tengo respeto por el trabajo que hacen. Hay algunas leyes importantes que se deben tratar como Aviación Civil, Hidrocarburos................>
<To the untutored ear it might just sound like a load of quacking, but British researchers have discovered that the country's ducks, much like its people, have distinct regional accents. --snip-- The Cornish ducks made longer and more relaxed sounds, much more chilled out. The cockney [London] quack is like a shout and a laugh, whereas the Cornish ducks sound more like they are giggling.>
http://smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/...
I am trying to sell my Levis Euro blond to buy Euro Level blond, but total illiquid :-(
In Abraxas, where are they going to finance their new investments from? Do they hold enough cash? New equity? Hope NOT new higher ranking debt!
Amateur 290, Discount at 74=17.74 YTM, 9.125=14.84 YTM (schweikram monkeys) and by the way , I see par in the discount blond in 9 months, when cp start , no more discount, only my opinion..
<Longleaf: Something is up On March 31, 2004, the Longleaf Small-Cap Fund held corporate bonds in an amount equivalent to 6.2% of the portfolio. They were Level 3 bonds: $130,650,000 (face amount) Level 3 Communications, Inc., 9.125% Senior Notes due 5-1-08 with a market value of $ 106,479,750 $72,580,000 (face amount) Level 3 Communications, Inc., 6% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 9-15-09 with a market value of $44,455,250 Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $115,108,697) with a market value of $150,935,000 See: http://www.longleafpartners.com/pdf... Longleaf has just released its May 31, 2004, portfolio statistics. Individual holdings are not specified, but the Small-Cap Fund has reduced bonds from 6.2% to 0.5% of the portfolio. Longleaf could have sold the Level 3 bonds and gone to cash, but I don't think so. On March 31, 2004, Longleaf held 67.8% of the portfolio in common stocks, with 11% in foreign stock holdings (56.8% in domestic common stocks). On May 31, 2004, Longleaf domestic common stock holdings jumped to 64.3% of the portfolio, and foreign stock holdings held steady at 11.2% of the portfolio. I don't know which domestic common stocks Longleaf has bought with the Level 3 bond sale proceeds, but I can guess. On March 31, LVLT was at 4. On May 31, LVLT was at 3.84. That would change the 4.5% of the Small-Cap Fund held in LVLT as of March 31 to 4.32% on May 31. If Longleaf traded its Level 3 bonds for more LVLT in a private equity for bonds swap, the amount of the portfoilio invested in LVLT would jump to a mutual fund industry maximum of 10% and domestic equity would rise to 62.5% (the differce to 64.3% can be explained by market action). The fact that Longleaf retained a 0.5% sliver of its Level 3 bond position on May 31 is consistent with the hypothesis that it converted its Level 3 bonds to LVLT equity because Longleaf cannot take more than a 10% position in the common stock of any publicly-traded company. See:
Re: Longleaf: Something is up
by: wcrimi 06/04/04 09:42 am
Msg: 400799 of 400809
What does everyone think about this?
Is this a good thing (we are reducing debt and interest costs and getting closer to FCFBE)?
Is this a bad thing (we are getting diluted further at a stock price that is not all that high)?
From the "watch what they do" perspective does this mean LVLT doesn't have a lot of confidence in the revenues?
Personally, this reinforces my view that the one and only mistake this company made with the balance sheet and finances was NOT doing swaps earlier in the year and just prior when the stock was in the 6s (assuming they didn't try - maybe they did). I like this move.
Yes, because, if they have 50.1%, they will stop the tender earlier..
L3, the 9.125/08 @ 83.5 yields 300bp less than the 12.25/10 @ 74, the discount should be worth 83 for equal YTM, you agree?
(btw, Level 3 blonds , over the past few days, pricing on the 9 1/8 for May 2008 has moved from the 70's to 83.50 )
Bond Bid Ask Chg SSP Chg
VE DCB 94 94.5 -0.5 451 8
VE Par 88.5 89.5 0.75 862 -44
VE Rep 10 79 81 1.5 533 -41
VE Rep 13 99 99.65 0.15 633 -5
VE Rep 18N 73.5 76.5 1.75 521 -32
VE Rep 18 111.5 112.5 0.5 705 -10
VE Rep 27 85.4 86 0.75 588 -14
VE Rep 34 85.25 85.65 0.65 596 -13
hi Merlino, the slump will not be over for a very long time, there are billions of writeoffs for the mortgage banks still in the pipeline and RE lending is close to standstill (except 1 family dwellings for own use)
all the result to the RE boom of the 90s
rgds.
spx looks like hanging on a cliff again, like wourld stocks and EMB...
Not good time for risk takers ahead IMHO...
Charts look ready to ploft! What will the market do with the last rally? The question of the weekend is still open... the money is leaving, slowly taking each and every improvment to leave risk....
CASH and Dolars stil look good this year...
Please read our disclaimer.
Home Page |
BradyNet Pro |
Search |
CyberExchange
General Correspondence: bradynet@bradynet.com
Questions/Problems? support@bradynet.com
This site copyright © 1995-2000 BradyNet.com
Forfaiting |
Closing Prices |
Live Prices |
New Issues |
Ratings
BradyNet Tour |
BradyNet FORUMs |
BradyNet Email Directory |
Index (Site Map)
Analysis & Research |
BradyNet Center |
News |
Jobs