![]() |
Emerging Markets |
|
|
Other Forums: What's New Bond Discussions Newslink |
|
|
Posted by
BradyNet
(
Thursday, June 17, '04
)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I agree with you. The heads of social orgaqnizations do not have the ability or true interest in understanding the issues involved, and fight for the interests of the poor.
Regards
<El nuevo Quintezz XT7000 Z-2 es el hermano mayor del Quintezz Z-1 que se vende con mucho éxito en Espagna.> WHO or WHAT is Espagna? some new pasta? :-)
Marginal Propensity to Consume of a country is defined as the first derivative of the consumption function of this country, in economic terms it means how mutch of any ADDITIONAL USD in GDP will be spent in consumption.
Soo, if a country has a consumption function as C(Y) = 10bi + 0,8 (Y), the MPC of this country is 0,8 or 80%.
Very good, but the MPC of any country depends on the Income distribution of that country. If a country is poor, but has a very bad income distribution, the MPC will be low, even being this country as poor as Brazil, or Argentina, or Iraq. This happens simply because, when GDP grows 1 dolar, this dolar, or 90% of that dolar, goes to the pocket of the ones that already have money and low MPC. In the end of the day, for a country to have a good, or high MPC it needs to distribute income first of all.
And why countries would like to have high MPC? Soo What is the relevance of all this MPC debate over economic policies?
The answear lies on the Keynesian Multiplier, that states that any change on economic policies (Fiscal and/or Monetary) will have a larger impact on growth as larger is the keynesian multiplier. AS the multplier is 1/1-c were c is the marginal propensity to consume, as larger the marginal propensity to consume larger the multiplier and more efficient will be the changes in any economic policy in terms of GDP growth with no inflation.
In other words, if you are dealing with a country that has a large MPC and a large multiplier, you can reduce only a little interest rates to atchive a stronger economic growth path with no inflation, compared to a country that has a smaller MPC.
This is why Brazil and Argentina, to exemplify with 2 known cases, can not atchive constant and vigorous growth paths on the medium term run, even having a lot of "potential". Bazil needs to distribute income first of all....
We can continue this debate latter, hope you enjoy this first words.
Regards
sold it today at 90
Carib, good impression, but i still hold some, but don't forget I am at +250% plofit, I think once you go up to 60, the upside potential is vely speculative..
"I kept score, how many people's lives were better off," he tells Rather. "People actually had the ability to do more things than ever before.>
Clinton said Starr was "the instrument of a grand design." The documentary, "The Hunting of the President," portrays Clinton as the target of a political smear campaign. One of the filmmakers, Harry Thomason, is a close friend of Clinton's.
"When the Berlin wall fell, the perpetual right in America, which always needs an enemy, didn't have an enemy any more, so I had to serve as the next best thing," Clinton said. >
http://www.radarshop.com/radardetec...
carib, following is from El Cronista article:
<La propuesta cobra la siguiente forma: Estirar el vencimiento del bono entre 8 y 10 años, desde el 2007 al 2015-2017. Cambiar el bono bullet (con pago íntegro de capital al final) por uno amortizable, con pagos parciales de capital trimestrales a partir del 2006. Reducir el cupón de intereses original de 10%, a uno con tasas entre 5,5% y 6%. Quitar a los nuevos bonos la garantía de regalías que llevan los bonos actuales....>
electrico, ofcause if you want to speed at 275, better go to Zolder, I never go more then 260 on the highway :-)
http://www.radarshop.com/radardetec...
Carib, now there is also transit German plates for one year and you can pronlonge it , how many years :-) the Swiss plates are good , but to sell the car you must go back to Swiss, with Germany , you can buy and sell it in Belgium :-)
Victor, Mejia does not like CONEP because they wanted the bank thieves to be prosecuted, criticised the bailout of the 70 plus big deposits, wanted clean elections. Mejia’s reply is that the people who make the govt officials corrupt are the big businesses looking for illegal govt favors.
Business wants < aprobar la reforma fiscal y propuso ampliar la base del Impuesto sobre la Transferencia de Bienes Industrializados y Servicios (ITBIS)>: Reform is a deceptive term. It implies changing something not optimal into optimal. The reform in DR context includes reducing taxes on the business and increasing the base for imposing ITBIS, meaning charging ITBIS on food and medicines. I think that this is an inappropriate time to saddle the poor with more taxes. Many people right now cannot afford to buy medicines and many food items(ex: milk , in fact half of population cannot afford to buy even small quantities of milk). So far the reforms have been discussed solely among business people, IMF staff and some well connected well–to-do economists, and without doubt in five star hotels. They need to be debated amply throughtout the society and therefore need some time. They cannot be rushed!
...
...Potential acquisition of Noranda could be dilutive to shareholders
We believe that CVRD’s potential acquisition of Noranda could be dilutive to CVRD’s
shareholders as we estimate that CVRD would pay 5.2X-5.3X EV/EBITDA for
Noranda based on ML’s 05E while CVRD is currently trading at 4.0X also based on
our 05E. Our analysis take into account a 20% premium to the average share price of
Noranda as of last month, or equivalent to $19.3/ADR (10% premium to yesterday’s close at
$17.5/ADR) as well as ~US$400-600 million of proceeds from asset divestitures (potentially
American Racing Equipment and Norandal USA), which wouldn’t be core for the new
company, in our view.
This transaction, if it occurs, would have a neutral impact on CVRD’s multiples if the
company pays ~$12.7/ADR of Noranda, or equivalent to a 27% discount to yesterday’s
close, which we believe is very unlikely. If CVRD were to pay our estimated price of ~$19.3
we would expect our NPV on CVRD to decline by a minimum of $2.60-$5.00/ADR
depending on the stake in Noranda (current NPV $61/ADR)...
...We reiterate our BUY investment opinion on CVRD as
we believe that the share price already reflects the
impact of CVRD’s potential acquisition of Noranda.
Please read our disclaimer.
Home Page |
BradyNet Pro |
Search |
CyberExchange
General Correspondence: bradynet@bradynet.com
Questions/Problems? support@bradynet.com
This site copyright © 1995-2000 BradyNet.com
Forfaiting |
Closing Prices |
Live Prices |
New Issues |
Ratings
BradyNet Tour |
BradyNet FORUMs |
BradyNet Email Directory |
Index (Site Map)
Analysis & Research |
BradyNet Center |
News |
Jobs