Presumably, there will be some contact information for Jennifer Engles in that affidavit so I can contact her and ask her how it is that she has any sort of an issue with me on anything when I have never heard of her name until you asked the question,she has never contacted me either by phone or by email.

If you think I am in breach of a communication from the State of Washington and are planning to go to the Securities Commission, drive safely, make sure you wear your seatbelt and when you get there make sure you identify whom you are and where you can be reached so that you can be served legal papers which will enable a process of legal discovery to occur.

I can't wait to see how you answer one of the questions that I will asking you in legal discovery; What do the following words mean to you "this post is for information purposes only and is not an offering of securities and is subject to the disclaimer at www.voy/com/20577/"

Since you are claiming that you are right around the corner from me, then feel free to drop by on Sunday afternoon around 1:30 p.m. You can then confirm for a fact that I am able to be here and not elsewhere as you falsely claimed. Bring a truck and some help and I'll even give you an old leather couch that you can take with you and find a place for it.

You are correct, all of this is going to the government. Soliciting an investment again are we???

You are now in BREACH of a government CEASE AND DESIST. I am going to be visiting the Securities Commission tomorrow morning, with Ms. Engles, at which time a formal affidavit is going to be sworn against you.

I have no idea who mtlbroker is or even if he or she is a broker. Judging solely by the language that he or she is using, it would not surprise me to discover that he or she is one frustrated regulator or pretend investigator and if so an incompetent one who works for a regulator who hates the fact that I and others use other peoples money and do so from a leveraged tax advantaged perspective with a view to an asset protection strategy and do it offshore. But one thing is clear, he or she refuses to accept the fact that the communication from the State of Washington is one sided and does not present the whole story on the issues that are raised in the communication and that specific communication does not preclude me from participating in a securities transaction if I so choose to do so as long as that transaction is compliant.

No matter how many different ways that concept is stated, it doesn't change the fact that mtlbroker is one stupid idiot. He or she claims to have read my "files" and states that the "government believes” I am a "fraud artist" and than has the sheer audacity to claim that I “misrepresent” or that “I own multiple entities for the purpose of misleading an investor about your professional contacts” and then claims as a “fact” I am a “fraudster” because he or she claims so. Who is the “government” and how does mtlbroker know what “the government” believes?

Anyone who has ever read any of my paperwork relating to a transaction can easily see that the information that is presented is done so in a clear and concise format to specifically preclude any potential for misrepresentation as well as the fact that the signing of a confidentiality agreement enables the person to engage in a focused due diligence review and can ask any question regarding any issue that they may wish or feel that they choose to discuss. That’s why there is a confidentiality agreement.

Once again mtlbroker had an opportunity to present his or her “undeniable truth” relating to the person that he named Jennifer Engels. I have no idea who she is or what sort of “undeniable truth” mtlbroker can present or what if any relevance that so called “undeniable truth” has to anything, all I know that “mtlbroker” is the only one that has failed miserably to back up any of his or her false claims and false allegations.

As for the solution to the problem of the Bradynet forums. There is a better way!

We know what the problems are, and we have an answer to the problems.

Our solution focuses on value and is designed to meet the needs of a both a financial professional as well as an investor and is coming soon.

We are looking for technically savvy or marketing oriented people and or a private investor that wants to earn 40% on their money with security for that money based on a 2:1 security ratio. The security interest will be recorded by the filing of a UCC1. Cash proceeds will be used to fine tune the planning, development and launch of the solution.

We can carve out increments of $ 50,000.00 from a UCC1 valued at $3,125,000.00 on a 2:1 security basis.

You put up $ 50,000.00 you get $ 100,000.00 in security.

We have designed the deal so that you can net out a flat 10% yield on each $ 50,000.00 increment every 90 days and receive the return of your funds. If you choose you can increase your yield from 10% to 40% by rolling over the $ 50,000.00 four times a year. That gives you $ 20,000.00 An annual percentage rate of 40% per annum.

A confidentiality agreement is required.

After we receive the confidentiality agreement we will send you a synopsis on the solution, if you feel you can add value to our solution in addition to the cash we would welcome your ideas and suggestions to help make our solution more beneficial to you as well.

Receipt of the cash will be as a payment for a personal services agreement and thus it will not be an investment contract and therefore cannot be deemed a security.

This post is not an offering of securities and is for information purposes only and is subject to the disclaimer at www.voy.com/20577/

You have government cease and desist orders against you: wonder how that happened? I read your files, the government believes you are a fraud artist. You misrepresent, own multiple entities for the purpose of misleading an investor about your "professional contacts".

You can call me a flake and a moron, but it doesn't change the fact that you are a fraudster -- just not smart enough to get away with it.

The people with whom I do business with are perfectly happy with my credentials. If they have any issues as to my professionalism or my abilities, those issues come out in a mutual professional due diligence review of the transaction and come about as a result of a confidentiality agreement between the parties and are dealt with accordingly and appropriately and in a private matter and certainly not in a public forum.

As I have said before, it is time for you to either put up or shut the f--- up. So far you have done neither. Why not start to prove that as you claim I live with my mother in the basement. That's an easy one to prove or disprove. All you have to do is come knock on my door at the residence you claim that I live in with my mother and see who lives there and who doesn't and what is or is not in the basement or even if there is a basement and check the closets of the bedrooms and see if there are any of my mothers clothes in any of them. Regardless of the fact as to where my mother does live or doesn’t live or where I live or don't live or what is in the basement of the home or where one of my offices is in one of my homes and where it located, none of that information has one iota of relevance to an offshore transaction. That is part of your problem; you don't understand the issues of offshore finance.

You are nothing but a flake and a moron who makes false accusations and when asked to provide information on the one person that you have ever named and claim that you will provide "undeniable proof" come back with another one of your asinine false statements.

You're the one claiming your so real. So prove it. And then everyone will know you're not a fake, a fraud and a cheat.

You definitely are a rich man, who hasn't been prohibited from offering securities in several states, and you don't live in your mother's basement.

As for your continued false allegations of whatever word you wish to use be it "scam", "frauster","cheat",etc. Don't you think it is time for you to give some specific facts that can be backed up with a foundation and basis in law to prove your point. So far when asked to provide any sort of credible evidence that can stand a test of evidence and be proven in a court of law, you are silent and you ignore the question. Either put up or shut the f--- up.

You talk about trust. What sort of trust or credibility do you generate when all you do is follow me around like a puppy dog and post under more than one name such as mtlbroker or mtnbroker123 or fund1970,etc. or any other flavor of the day that you choose to use in a feeble attempt to show that you are more than one person. The bottom line is that it is you who is attacking me for no reason and doing so like a f---ing coward hiding behind a white sheet. You don't even have the guts to state your own name, your own telephone number or your own email and you expect people to give any sort of weight to what you say?. You are the one that is trying to perpetrate a scam in this forum by your feeble attempts to denigrate my character.

As to your false assertion that no one believes what I say. That’s your opinion. I won’t make a statement unless I can back it up with a fact. My words speak for themselves and many people who have responded to my posts have thanked me for the knowledge that they have gained and for the smarts that I exhibit. I wonder how many people have contacted you? Probably none, as you leave no contact information. That says it all!

I wouldn't trust you as far as I could throw you.

Everyone here knows you're a cheat.

We remind all of that fact, and I guarantee no one, except of course, your fantasy lawyers, accountants and investors believe a word you say.

The first legal principal is known as "an invitation to deal" which simply means what it says. Give me a call and we will talk, nothing more nothing less. The fact that there is a general inference of something of a subject or a description of what we may want to talk about does not make that “a” security.

The Securities department of the State of Washington knows my phone number and if they want to speak to me or hear from me they will call me. They haven’t done so in over a year. They are perfectly well aware of the statutes pertaining to the issuance of "a" security in the state of Washington which clearly states in the statutes "a". Pay particular close attention to that little "a". You can't offer “a” security if the “security” does not exist which by definition means that you first have to have "a" security that comes into being which can be attributed to a transaction before it can be issued.

The mere posting of “a” phone number and “a” name and engaging in a conversation with someone that chooses to respond of and by itself is not an offering of “a” security. The State of Washington knows that principal of communications as do other regulators throughout the world.

The second principal of law is known as "In forum jurisdiction" which means where does the transaction actually take place?. The parties to a transaction are entitled to determine thier choice of law as well as venue meaning under what laws and in what place is their transaction subject to regulation.

Since this post as well as other posts that I make are accessible to those that visit this forum from many different jurisdictions worldwide, we specifically state in our disclaimer that no “accession” to any jurisdiction is granted which means we recognize none for the simple reason the access via the web is equal from Alaska to Armenia to Afghanistan, to Vanuatu to Venezuela as well as the Yukon Territories and any of the almost 200 other countries worldwide and their various sub-jurisdictions. For example, if a deal were to be done in China, it depends where in China that deal is to be done even though Chinese law applies as certain transactions as well as jurisdictions have special attributes available to those jurisdictions that do not apply elsewhere in China. So until “a” securities transaction comes into being and "a" security is issued to which a transaction can be attributed to, there is no jurisdictional issue. Take another look at the disclaimer at www.voy.com/20577/ and read it carefully, if you disagree with it then challenge it in court.

If you don’t believe me, then call back the State of Washington and ask them to send you a copy of the statutes and you will notice that little “a” in the statutes.

If you or moneybroker123 think I am in "deep trouble" then all you have to do is provide facts that can be proven in a court of law, the context of those facts and the basis of the foundation behind those facts. So far all you have done is make false accusations.

Qualified investors and financial professionals are invited to call Mayer Etkin at 206-723-9353 or send an email to capsol@comcast.net

I would suggest one.

If you wish to review the point by point rebuttal to their communication as well as receive a copy of the draft of the language of the settlement letter, all you need to do is sign off on a confidentiality agreement and I will send you a copy. You can then read the other side of the story, have the full picture of what the issues are in their proper context and then make a reasonably informed judgment as to what really occurred or did not occur.

To the moron mtlbroker, there has never been a reason for any court in any jurisdiction anywhere in the world requiring me to do anything on the weekend or any other time period that I choose not to do or to be where I want to be. I have absolutely no idea where the hell you came up with such an absurd notion that just because I choose not to visit this forum on a weekend that somehow that means that I am unable to communicate freely or do what I wish on the weekend.

The people that I do business with are always provided with an appropriate disclosure and that transaction is fully compliant. It is asinine for the flakes and the morons in this forum to make a judgment as to what they think is the nature of the transaction or how it is put together and in what form.

Yes, I work with lawyers and smart ones who know how to read, who understand the context of what they read and know the perspective of the communications from regulators and how they apply to a particular transaction. The fact of the matter is that anybody who has taken the time to read the point by point rebuttal to the State of Washington knows that no securities violation occurred.

Corporation
CAPITAL SOLUTIONS INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS PBN INTERNATIONAL Number: C1658339 Date Filed: 2/14/1990 Status: forfeited Jurisdiction: NEVADA
Address
11601 WILSHIRE BLVD., #2350
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
Agent for Service of Process
MAYER ETKIN
1223 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE #583 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403

Mayer doesn't care about laws, he thinks that a non-binding confidentiality agreement will protect him. If he could afford a lawyer he would know that an illegal contract is unenforcable.

If he doesn't care about the law, then its clear that fraud is not a problem for him. He claims to be working with lawyers and investors, but the fact is, that anyone with a scintilla of brain-power would disavow any thing from him the moment they were aware of the cease and desist order issued by the Washington State government.

He claims they settled their differences but doesn't produce anything to show it.

Its just fraud fraud fraud for Mayer, I only hope others get the truth about him before its too late.

TO THOSE REAL PLAYERS AND VISITORS WHO WANT TO GET RID OF SCAM

Be careful before you send money to this guy.

How a man run his SCAMS? He gives peopole lesson about offshore finance, trade, investments etc. and scams them out of their money in the name of due dilligence, setting up deals, positionting a deal. He claims to be a principal when he has nothing. He is running his scam business form his mother's basement.

All of his postings are to SCAM people for $100,000.00 or more. All of his postings had previously prepared and also posted ,nothing new. He wants money from people different ways. Sometimes he changes the amount from $100,000.00 to other figures. But the same thing SCAM, SCAM , and SCAM.

People who speak against him or his alleged SCAM will become the moron, flakes etc. He calls them with these names. Well anything said against him is an off topic issue and not a good due dilligence according to him.

QUESTION: WHO IS THIS MAN RUNNING THESE KINDS OF SCAM BUSINESS?

ANSWER: MAYER ETKIN.

WHO WILL STOP THIS MAYER ETKIN.

1. Whatever is posted is for information purposes only. Although some posts may have common elements with other posts, each post is different.

2. The point of the post is to have a qualified person pick up the phone or send an email which many people do.

3. A confidentiality agreement is sent out and is returned.

4. After the agreement is returned the parties engage in discussions as to what if anything they will do and on what basis.

5. Based on # 4, what follows is between the parties and is none of yours or anyone else’s business, that is why it is called private investment.

If you want to live up to the moniker that you have chosen, then why not start by identifying who you are and where you can be reached by telephone or email that are verifiable, then you might have some credibility!

What makes you think you are even qualified to do business with me? or that I would even consider accepting anything from you?. I don't do business with flakes or morons. I do business with qualified people who understand the process of mutual and focused due diligence on real issues which occurs after a confidentiality agreement is in place.