Click Here for Main Forum Menu New Deals  
MAIN
MENU ARTICLE LIST POST REPLY EDIT PROFILE MEMBERS AREA REGISTER HELP
Please Visit Our Sponsor * Click Here!
Posted by mtlbroker (Sunday, October 01, 2006)
Mayer Etkin: Right from the Government
Below is a direct excerpt from the DFI order against him. There is no amendment to this order registered, and his "negotiations" are just bulls*it. He's still violating the law on a daily basis.

Mayer Etkin and Capital Solutions, Inc. have each violated RCW 21.20.040 by offering and/or selling said securities while not registered as a securities salesperson or broker-dealer in the state of Washington. IV.
The offer and/or sale of said securities was made in violation of RCW 21.20.010 because its failure to disclose the prior cease and desist order entered against Mayer Etkin and Capital Solutions, Inc. made the statements that were made about their experience misleading. Further, the failure to provide financial statements or other financial information and sufficient information to allow an investor to evaluate the investments made the statements that were made misleading. V. The Securities Administrator finds that an emergency exists, that the continued violations of RCW 21.20.010, RCW 21.20.040, and RCW 21.20.140 constitute a threat to the investing public,

Replies start here:
Newest messages appear on top.

10-03-06  Hotdog: mlbroker, I see that you are back to using your other alias from fund1970? I guess that you never learned the fact of life when it comes to the American Justice System that one is innocent until proven guilty.

I do what I please and I am perfectly able to do so and do it quite well and am not precluded by any court of law anywhere in the world from doing anything.

You continue to make false allegations against me, false claims, and yet provide absolutely no evidence of any kind that can be proven in a court of law.

You claimed that I made a statement that was false concerning a banker. I gave you the opportunity to prove me wrong thorough a legal process. I can show “proof” in a court of law that it is a true statement.

In case you missed it, this is what I said in response to one of your false allegations.

“if you think my comment regarding the US banker is BS. Then here is an opportunity for you to prove it. Why not publicly post who you are, where you can be reached, and a physical street address where you can be served legal papers. As a process of mutual discovery as a result of that legal process, you can ask me the question, "who is the banker?" In this particular case, I would call that banker up and ask him to produce a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury attesting to the fact of what I said. Despite the fact that we have a mutual confidentiality agreement in place (the banker and I) we would each give a waiver to that agreement to enable the sworn affidavit to be produced before the court with the stipulation that the sworn affidavit under federal rules of civil procedure be sealed in the records of the court and you of course would have to agree to maintain the confidentiality of the knowledge and contents of the sworn affidavit.

Let's see if you have the balls to accept the challenge? I doubt it as you are great at ignoring the real issues and continue with your false allegations.

Mayer Etkin can be reached at 206-723-9353 or via email at capsol@comcast.net.

Where can this flake, moron, fool, dumbass schmuck and coward known as mtlbroker123, moneybroker123,honestbroker,fund1970,etc. be reached at? Does anybody know?


10-03-06  mtlbroker: Double talk again...

If you are innocent. Prove it. No agreements, no bull*hit, just show that you have been found innocent, the gov't has apologized and you can do what you please.

Of course -- there will be no disclosure as you are still as fraudulent as the day you were convicted.

The con artist, hard at work -- Mayer, the super grifter.


10-02-06  Hotdog: mtlbroker, the truth is simple. You refuse to accept it. I have never said that the "government apologized to me" nor have I have ever said that they gave me “Cart Blanche” for anything or that I am the "best guy in the world". You are quoting a small part of the communication from the State of Washington totally out of context which creates a false impression.

The fact of the matter is very simple. The state of Washington in their communication to me raised some issues, I responded to those issues in a detailed 40 page response. After they read my response, they agreed that no securities violation occurred, and that is why they offered me a letter that would state that I neither admit nor deny that any securities violation occurred. You claimed that you have spoken with the State. If you had done that, then why not call the person you spoke with and ask them specifically what thier response was to my response and they you will know the truth.

No one in this forum has ever asked you to continually post your fraudulent misrepresentations about me, your false allegations and your false claims. This forum is not about me or what I have said on an internet posting.

If anyone wants to know the truth about the issues with the State of Washington and not the bullshit, all you need to do is call Mayer Etkin at 206-723-9353 or send an email to capsol@comcast.net and sign off on a confidentiality agreement and I will send you a copy of my 40 page response to the State of Washington which refutes every single one of thier points and deals with the issues that are raised as well as a copy of the draft of the proposed settlement letter which places the communication in its proper context. That is how one does professional due dilignece as opposed to the utter bullshit that mtlbroker123, nee mtnbroker123, nee funds1970,nee honestbroker or whatever alias this obsessed moron wants to use.


10-02-06  mtlbroker: The day that Mayer admits his wrong doings, I will stop posting about him.

Thus far he denies ANY wrong doing, and claims that the government apologized to him, gave him carte blanche, and that he's the best guy in the world.

Come clean Mayer, admit the truth, and all this ends.


10-01-06  sapphirecapital: Personally I do not understand why you pursue this the way you do, however thats your pleasure (if it is one at all). I do object to the fact that you do not give a source of your claim. The actual link was posted before (http://www.dfi.wa.gov/sd/orders/SDO... The issue has been discussed in this forum before I even heard of the forum (http://www.bradynet.com/bbs/newdeal... Information and links can be found on the diligizer forum as well, I believe with a reference to Shangye Capital Partners,6719 Seward Park Avenue, Seattle, WA. 98118. I further believe that the issue was taken by the Washington State Government over the offer http://bizbb.com/ServicesBB/offer/7... There seems to be an order of prohibitin on the same from the Illinois Securities Department but they took it offline (could be that the reason is a waiver or simply a matter of space since they start their new website with files in 2003. (see http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/d... There is some messages on foeign boards about a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing about the same time and abundance of real estate related postings. He also holds himself out as Offshore investment specialists, expertise to maximize financial spreads through trading of financial instruments, credit enhancements and currency swaps. (http://bportal.com/VentureCapitalAn... and all kind of offshore situations and discussions are posted.

Can we close the matter now? The man is a broker, never said anything else, tries his hand in areas he believes he has knowledge and contacts and is posting his coordinates , whereabouts etc all over the net. He is neither hidding nor is there a criminal proceeding following the 2001 order in the ste he is living. His living arrangements are his personal decicion and may have reasons which are private and should be none of your business.

Anyone who wants to do business with him can do the research and the investment of time to do so is normally always necessary if you have good common sense.

I can neither endorse nor negate anything about him because I neither know him nor do I have a business relation ship. The above quotes and links are public knowledge. I can understand a man getting into discussions with a government agency in 2001 is anoyed to have it brought up constantly and I can understand a man answering to all the kind of allegations and rude words you are posting. I can not understand a man throwing dirt without facts and origin of the facts he quotes.

Please do everyone a favour and do this either right or not at all.


Click here to post a reply.


Please Visit Our Sponsor * Click Here!

Please read our disclaimer.

Home Page | BradyNet Pro | Search | CyberExchange
Forfaiting | Closing Prices | Live Prices | New Issues | Ratings
BradyNet Tour | BradyNet FORUMs | BradyNet Email Directory | Index (Site Map)
Analysis & Research | BradyNet Center | News | Jobs

General Correspondence: bradynet@bradynet.com    Questions/Problems? support@bradynet.com
Mail this page to a friend

This site copyright © 1995-2000 BradyNet.com